Have you made any progress on the subject? People who only have a joint account are disadvantaged by not having access to the future account... it's a shame... and incomprehensible

I have just signed up for a joint account and a future account. Afterwards, I discovered that it was not possible to give power of attorney to my spouse. They therefore suggest that I open a joint account, but in this case I can no longer have a future account, nor benefit from the virtual card. It is very unfortunate, it seems to me that it is urgent to propose this possibility

Indeed, we only opened a joint account because we do not need to have an individual account each. And I just saw that we can't put on a future account because we would also have to have one of us two have an individual account that would not be useful to us..

This would be a real big plus for joint account management to no longer have to depend on other banks or solutions that are paid and polluting at all!

Yesiiiii! A savings pool for the common account!

yes please!!!

Okay also I don't understand why you can't put savings into savings without an individual account. However, it is advantageous for the bank. And it is too expensive for the user to have to pay an individual account that he does not need + to give up the performance of a passbook that is supported by the State, especially when they are regulated passbooks (LEP, passbook A...). So it's a deterrent, too bad

I agree with Marion! I still don't understand why Helios deprives itself of the “investment” of those who don't have an individual current account. It is clearly an additional source that would contribute to your announced objective (the 100m in the ecological transition). We are counting on you Helios to allow us to do it this year 😁!! Or explain to us concretely why you don't want to.

More generally, the joint account should be considered as a current account.